{"id":184727,"date":"2014-11-12T04:00:31","date_gmt":"2014-11-11T18:00:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=184727"},"modified":"2014-11-12T04:00:31","modified_gmt":"2014-11-11T18:00:31","slug":"ogumoros-kosams-motion-dismiss-charges-denied","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/ogumoros-kosams-motion-dismiss-charges-denied\/","title":{"rendered":"Ogumoro\u2019s, Kosam\u2019s motion to dismiss charges denied"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Superior Court Associate Judge David A. Wiseman has denied the motion of former Department of Public Safety deputy commissioner Ambrosio T. Ogumoro and former Commonwealth Ports Authority chief Jordan Kosam to dismiss the criminal charges against them. <\/p>\n<p>In an eight-page order on Friday, Wiseman ruled that Ogumoro and Kosam patently ignore the crucial fact that the court exercised its inherent authority to appoint a special prosecutor to handle this particular case, and as such, each and every ground the two cited for dismissal is without legal or factual merit.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman found their arguments meritless, incredulous, and nearly sanctionable.<\/p>\n<p>The judge denied any related argument based upon the Office of the Public Auditor\u2019s supposed invalid authority to prosecute the case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe court will further investigate whether the arguments contained within the instant motion are subject to Rule 11 sanctions,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>On Aug. 17, 2012, Wiseman appointed OPA legal counsel George L. Hasselback as special prosecutor and charged him with the investigation and prosecution of matters or persons that are connected or relevant to the charges filed against former attorney general Edward T. Buckingham.<\/p>\n<p>On March 20, 2013, Hasselback filed an information charging Ogumoro with 15 different counts of criminal violations relating to misconduct in public office.<\/p>\n<p>On Sept. 29, 2014, Ogumoro filed the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. <\/p>\n<p>Attorney Edward Arriola Sr., counsel for Ogumoro, argued that OPA lacks constitutional and legislative authorities to prosecute the defendant, that the Office of the Attorney General has no authority to delegate his prosecutorial powers to the OPA or personnel within the agency, and that an executive order will not cure the violation of the separation of powers.<\/p>\n<p>In the government\u2019s opposition to the motion, Hasselback claimed that the court should \u201cdeny the motion in its entirety as the arguments\u2026are based upon a complete misunderstanding of the salient facts surrounding the prosecution of this case.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>During the hearing of the motion last Oct. 22, attorney Joaquin Torres, counsel for co-defendant Kosam, joined in Ogumoro\u2019s motion to dismiss.<\/p>\n<p>In his order denying the motion, Wiseman cautioned Torres to exercise due diligence and first review its merits, if any, before making such future requests, as the court finds no merit in the motion.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman clarified that the court\u2019s Aug. 17, 2012 order\u2014which purported to delegate prosecutorial authority to counsel for the OPA pursuant to the court\u2019s inherent authority to appoint a special prosecutor\u2014is not the subject of Ogumoro\u2019s challenge.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman said the court would not entertain such an argument, which was not made in neither Ogumoro\u2019s written filings nor during the hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman said the Commonwealth plainly, simply, and correctly argues that OPA was, in fact, designated as a special prosecutor by the court, which conferred absolute prosecutorial authority upon the OPA to prosecute this case.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman refused to acknowledge and dismissed as irrelevant the defendant\u2019s reliance upon Superior Court Associate Judge Kenneth L. Govendo\u2019s decision in the criminal case against former Aging Division director Rose Mondala.<\/p>\n<p>In Mondala\u2019s case, Govendo dismissed the case, citing a violation of the separation of powers doctrine and finding that \u201cthe AG has no authority to delegate his prosecutorial powers to OPA or personnel within the OPA.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman recognized that the Mondala case has absolutely no bearing on the outcome of Ogumoro\u2019s case\u2014\u201cas the two are polar opposites factually\u2014and defendant\u2019s conflicting arguments remain irreconcilable.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the Mondala case, Wiseman said the AG purported to assign or delegate prosecutorial authority to OPA, which the court said flies in the face of the AG\u2019s exclusive authority to prosecute instances of criminal violations within the CNMI.<\/p>\n<p>In Ogumoro\u2019s case, Wiseman said  the court again stressed that it exercised its inherent authority to delegate a special prosecutor to prosecute a criminal case, and appointed the OPA to represent the Commonwealth.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman said Ogumoro\u2019s arguments fundamentally ignore obvious and readily apparent facts, of which he knew or should have known, in order to bolster arguments that are irrelevant, inapposite, and groundless.<\/p>\n<p>He cautioned Ogumoro to refrain from filing frivolous or completely groundless motions, regardless of whether his lawyer claims he was unaware of essential facts that effectively render his entire motion moot.<\/p>\n<p>OPA charged Ogumoro with 15 criminal charges for his role in, among other things, shielding then-AG Buckingham from being served with penal summons in August 2012.<\/p>\n<p>Aside from Ogumoro and Kosam, OPA also filed criminal charges against former CPA police captain John T. Rebuenog, former governor Benigno Fitial and Fitial\u2019s former personal driver and bodyguard, Jermaine Joseph W. Nekaifes, for their participation in shielding Buckingham from being served with penal summons. <\/p>\n<p>Govendo dismissed the case against Nekaifes at Hasselback\u2019s request. <\/p>\n<p>Last Feb. 19, Govendo found Buckingham guilty of all public corruption charges except one and sentenced him to 3.5 years in prison, all suspended. Govendo recused from presiding over the cases against the remaining defendants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Superior Court Associate Judge David A. Wiseman has denied the motion of former Department of&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[900,4],"tags":[1198,639,136,215],"class_list":["post-184727","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-featured","category-local-news","tag-commonwealth-ports-authority","tag-joaquin-torres","tag-opa","tag-public-safety"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184727","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=184727"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/184727\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=184727"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=184727"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=184727"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}