{"id":19606,"date":"2012-05-17T07:03:07","date_gmt":"2012-05-17T07:03:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/newspaper.ctsi-logistics.com\/?p=19606"},"modified":"2012-05-17T07:03:07","modified_gmt":"2012-05-17T07:03:07","slug":"lawyers-atalig-yana-suspended","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/lawyers-atalig-yana-suspended\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawyers Atalig, Yana suspended"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>By Ferdie de la Torre<br \/>\nReporter<\/div>\n<p>Superior Court Associate Judge David A. Wiseman suspended yesterday attorneys Antonio M. Atalig and Reynaldo O. Yana from practicing law in the CNMI for refusing to return $1.1 million in attorneys&#8217; fees that the two obtained from the Angel Malite estate.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman said the suspension will remain in place until Atalig and Yana have complied with certain conditions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe misconduct of [Atalig and Yana].reflects adversely on an attorney&#8217;s honesty, trustworthiness and fitness as a lawyer,\u201d Wiseman said.<\/p>\n<p>He believes that the two&#8217;s misconduct resulted in serious injuries to the legal profession, clients, the public, and the legal system in general through a disparagement of the administration of justice.<\/p>\n<p>Wiseman required Atalig and Yana to pay at least 10 percent of the funds that they received as attorney fees and have been ordered disgorged. They each must present a proposed payment plan for their balance of the funds that they must pay back.<\/p>\n<p>They were also ordered to pay the court for the costs of prosecuting this disciplinary matter and to pay to any and all clients any unearned retainer fees.<\/p>\n<p>The disciplinary hearing was held on July 20, 2011. Atalig and Yana represented themselves in the proceedings. Attorney Thomas E. Clifford served as court-appointed disciplinary counsel.<\/p>\n<p>The complaint alleged that Atalig and Yana violated provisions of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct during their representation of clients and handling of estate funds.<\/p>\n<p>Atalig and Yana were given $1,138,500 in contingency fee on May 28, 2006. On June 1, 2006, only three to four days later, the Malite heirs represented by attorney Stephen Nutting filed a motion for a restraining order for the two to return the fees.<\/p>\n<p>The court granted Nutting&#8217;s request, ordering Atalig and Yana to return the attorneys&#8217; fees, with a threat of contempt proceedings if they fail to do so. The two did not comply.<\/p>\n<p>In his order yesterday, Wiseman said that both Atalig and Yana knew that the $1,138,500 contingency fee was in dispute.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNotwithstanding the fact that the motion to disgorge the fees placed them on clear and unequivocal notice that there was a dispute regarding the fees, they did not preserve, separate or safeguard the funds,\u201d Wiseman said.<\/p>\n<p>Not only were the disputed fees not safeguarded nor separated, they were spent by the respondents who then evaded the court&#8217;s order to account for the fees as to how they were spent, he said.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cRespondents were so unwilling and blatantly recalcitrant in cooperating with the court and providing an accounting of the funds.that they were placed in contempt of court and spent more than a year in jail rather than comply with the court&#8217;s order,\u201d the judge said.<\/p>\n<p>He said Atalig and Yana told the court that they had spent all of the $1,138,500 contingency fee, which is inconsistent with what was told to a reporter immediately after the hearing by Atalig who claimed he still had money left, but he was not going to say how much.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAtalig&#8217;s contradiction immediately after the hearing to a news reporter highlights the blatant disregard for the falsity of the statements given to the court,\u201d Wiseman said.<\/p>\n<p>Atalig and Yana got out of the Department of Corrections on Dec. 24, 2009, after nearly one and one-half year in jail.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Ferdie de la Torre Reporter Superior Court Associate Judge David A. Wiseman suspended yesterday&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-19606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}