{"id":225912,"date":"2016-04-20T06:06:34","date_gmt":"2016-04-19T20:06:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=225912"},"modified":"2016-04-20T06:06:34","modified_gmt":"2016-04-19T20:06:34","slug":"oag-opposes-radich-couples-request-103k-legal-fees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/oag-opposes-radich-couples-request-103k-legal-fees\/","title":{"rendered":"OAG opposes Radich couple\u2019s request for $103K in legal fees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Office of the Attorney General is opposing the request of U.S. Navy veteran David J. Radich and his wife, Li-Rong, for payment for their two lawyers in the total amount of $103,913.83 for attorney\u2019s fees and expenses for prevailing in their lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of the CNMI gun\u2019s control law. <\/p>\n<p>Assistant attorney general James M. Zarones said plaintiffs Radich couple are requesting fees that could not reasonably be billed to a private client.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said plaintiffs also failed to provide the U.S. District Court for the NMI with evidence of the prevailing market rates in the NMI.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones is counsel for former Department of Public Safety commissioner James C. Deleon Guerrero and Finance Secretary Larrisa Larson, who are sued in their official capacity by the Radich couple.<\/p>\n<p>Attorneys David G. Sigale and Daniel T. Guidotti are asking the court to award them attorney\u2019s fees in the amount of $80,325 and $15,347.50, respectively. The lawyers are also requesting payment of $8,241.33 in costs.<\/p>\n<p>In the defendants\u2019 opposition, Zarones said plaintiffs\u2019 attorneys are requesting fees for clerical work and work that should have been performed by paralegals.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said it was unreasonable for an attorney billing $500 an hour to spend .7 hours drafting the civil cover sheet.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said it was unreasonable for an attorney billing $500 an hour to spend time drafting an entry of appearance.<\/p>\n<p>He said the government should not be required to pay attorney fees for conversations with third parties.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones noted that on Nov. 18, 2012, Sigale traveled 2.4 hours to meet with an individual named Gray Peterson and that the meeting lasted an hour.<\/p>\n<p>He said Sigale traveled again 2.5 hours to meet Peterson on Nov. 23, 2013, and that the meeting lasted an hour.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said Sigale discussed logistics and possibility of bringing a lawsuit in the first meeting and again discussed necessary steps for bringing a possible lawsuit in the second meeting.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said Peterson is not an attorney providing representation to plaintiffs in this case, nor there was any records indicate that Peterson had any relevance to this case.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said the government should not be required to pay for the duplicative effort of researching and drafting four separate complaints in this case.<\/p>\n<p>He said Sigale should not receive $10,500 for his travel to the CNMI because the original complaint and motion for summary judgment were defective.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said the memorandum in support of attorney fees is a cut-and-paste document that fails to provide the court with the information necessary to establish the reasonable hourly rate to be applied.<\/p>\n<p>Zarones said Sigale represents that he spent five hours researching and drafting a memorandum in support of his fee request.<br \/>\nHowever, Zarones said, the memorandum is nothing more than a copy and paste of a memorandum Sigale filed in a previous lawsuit.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Office of the Attorney General is opposing the request of U.S. Navy veteran David&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[26,11041,259,86],"class_list":["post-225912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news","tag-cnmi","tag-gray-peterson","tag-lawsuit","tag-oag"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=225912"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/225912\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=225912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=225912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=225912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}