{"id":244966,"date":"2017-01-24T06:06:09","date_gmt":"2017-01-23T20:06:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=244966"},"modified":"2017-01-24T06:06:09","modified_gmt":"2017-01-23T20:06:09","slug":"nmpasi-laments-scotus-case-students-disabilities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/nmpasi-laments-scotus-case-students-disabilities\/","title":{"rendered":"NMPASI laments SCOTUS case on students with disabilities"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In what disability rights advocates are saying is \u201cthe most significant special-education issue to reach the U.S. Supreme Court in three decades,\u201d Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District involves a dispute over the level of education that public schools must provide to millions of children with disabilities in accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.  <\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court rendered its first opinion on the intricacies of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and its \u201cfree appropriate public education\u201d mandate in the case of Board of Education v. Rowley 458 U.S. 176 (1982). The Rowley case clearly states that FAPE must be \u201ctailored to the unique needs of the handicapped child by means of an individualized educational program,\u201d thereby emphasizing the critical principle of individuality and it also explains the central importance of considering each student\u2019s educational potential when seeking to determine whether a student is receiving sufficient educational benefit.  But in so doing, the high court famously left unanswered the question of \u201chow much benefit is sufficient under the IDEA\u2019s FAPE mandate,\u201d stating only that \u201cwe do not attempt today to establish any one test for determining the adequacy of educational benefits conferred upon all children covered by the Act.\u201d The lower courts are divided on the issue, meaning that some states strive to provide greater levels of educational benefit than others and that students in certain states can expect more from their public education than others.  <\/p>\n<p>The argument currently before the U.S. Supreme Court is on whether public schools \u201cowe disabled children \u2018some\u2019 educational benefit\u2014which courts have determined to mean just-above-trivial progress\u2014or whether students legally deserve something more: a substantial, \u2018meaningful\u2019 benefit\u201d (Brown, Washington Post). This has caught the attention of local advocates at the Northern Marianas Protection &amp; Advocacy Systems, Inc., otherwise known as NMPASI.  <\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo much of what we have stood and advocated for all these years,\u201d according to Jim Rayphand, NMPASI\u2019s executive director, \u201cis that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act \u2018is meant not just to open the schoolhouse door to disabled children\u2026but also to make sure that those children get an education that gives them a shot at equal opportunity, independent life and full participation in society\u2019\u201d (Brown, Washington Post).  <\/p>\n<p>Lawyer and NMPASI board member Rob Torres thinks that \u201cnothing can be more challenging for a parent of a child with a disability than to advocate for an appropriate education. That child will become an adult and the parent\u2019s greatest challenge and fear is to ensure he or she grows up capable to succeed with a great education. The standard remains here with PSS.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>The case was brought by the family of a boy diagnosed with autism and attention-deficit\/hyperactivity disorder. His conditions complicated his efforts to communicate and socialize, and that left him struggling with phobias and compulsive behaviors.  Noting that their son made almost no academic or social progress during his time in public school, the parents eventually withdrew him and placed him in a private school where they say he made progress immediately.  Accordingly they sought reimbursement for the private school tuition under the pretext that their son was denied a \u201cfree appropriate public education.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is without question a close case,\u201d Judge Timothy Tykovich wrote in his opinion for the 10th Circuit. It is clear, he continued, that Drew is thriving at the private school. \u201cBut it is not the district\u2019s burden to pay for his placement there when Drew was making some progress under its tutelage. That is all that is required\u201d (Brown, Washington Post).<\/p>\n<p>Jimmy Sablan, NMPASI\u2019s program manager, said, \u201cThis is an age-old point of contention trying to draw a line between asking for the Cadillac when schools say they only need to provide a Buick\u2014the standard to date has been what\u2019s most \u2018appropriate\u2019 which is very subjective and usually means that \u2018the squeaky wheel gets the grease.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Rayphand concludes: \u201cFrankly, I\u2019m not surprised that a school system would argue for a minimum standard\u2014it\u2019s easier to provide\u2014but I can\u2019t be convinced that a push for anything less than a free appropriate public education that is \u2018meaningful\u2019 in the context of becoming a contributing member of society would be the right thing for any of our students (with disabilities or otherwise).\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In what disability rights advocates are saying is \u201cthe most significant special-education issue to reach&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[37,15245,1502,15246],"class_list":["post-244966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news","tag-education-2","tag-fape","tag-nmpasi","tag-scotus"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=244966"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/244966\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=244966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=244966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=244966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}