{"id":253788,"date":"2017-06-06T06:00:29","date_gmt":"2017-06-05T20:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=253788"},"modified":"2017-06-06T06:00:29","modified_gmt":"2017-06-05T20:00:29","slug":"lawsuit-vs-ex-national-guard-recruiting-assistant-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/lawsuit-vs-ex-national-guard-recruiting-assistant-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Lawsuit vs ex-National Guard recruiting assistant dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. government\u2019s lawsuit against a former National Guard recruiting assistant has been dismissed after both parties reached a settlement agreement.<\/p>\n<p>U.S. District Court for the NMI Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona dismissed the case with prejudice, which means the U.S. government could no longer re-file the civil complaint against Ana Maria A. Mendiola.<\/p>\n<p>Assistant U.S. attorney Mikel W. Schwab, counsel for the U.S. government, and attorney Robert T. Torres, counsel for Mendiola, filed a stipulation for the case\u2019s voluntary dismissal.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. government sued Mendiola for four counts of violation of False Claims Act, one count of unjust enrichment, and one count of payment by mistake<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. government accused Mendiola of defrauding the Army National Guard by claiming to have nominated four potential soldiers over a two-year period. <\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit demanded payment from Mendiola in the total sum of $21,000 for damages, as well as penalties and court costs.<\/p>\n<p>The parties, however, settled the case.<\/p>\n<p>Under the settlement deal, Mendiola agreed to pay $15,000 to the U.S. government. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The U.S. government\u2019s lawsuit against a former National Guard recruiting assistant has been dismissed after&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[6871,93,14406,259],"class_list":["post-253788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news","tag-army-national-guard","tag-district-court","tag-false-claims-act","tag-lawsuit"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=253788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/253788\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=253788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=253788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=253788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}