{"id":261540,"date":"2017-10-03T06:06:31","date_gmt":"2017-10-02T20:06:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=261540"},"modified":"2017-10-03T06:06:31","modified_gmt":"2017-10-02T20:06:31","slug":"dynasty-owners-lawsuit-uscis-officials-dismissed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/dynasty-owners-lawsuit-uscis-officials-dismissed\/","title":{"rendered":"Dynasty owner\u2019s lawsuit against USCIS, officials dismissed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Citing the federal court\u2019s lack of jurisdiction, U.S. District Court for the NMI Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona dismissed on Sunday the lawsuit filed by the owner of the now-defunct Tinian Dynasty Hotel &amp; Casino against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security acting Secretary Elaine Duke, and USCIS acting director James McCament over the denial of its petitions for CW-1 extension and transfer for its foreign workers. <\/p>\n<p>In a 14-page ruling, Manglona said because the period in which plaintiff Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investments Ltd. petitioned for CW-1 permits for beneficiaries has expired, the court cannot provide a remedy for the alleged injury of workforce deprivation, HKE therefore lacks standing.<\/p>\n<p>In dismissing the case with prejudice, Manglona said because no amendment could cure the jurisdictional defect, allowing HKE to amend the lawsuit would be futile.<\/p>\n<p>The judge directed the court\u2019s clerk to close the case and enter judgment in favor of defendants USCIS, Duke, and McCament.<\/p>\n<p>As official-capacity defendants, Duke and McCament have been automatically substituted for the original defendants\u2014former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson and former USCIS director Leon Rodriguez, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Defendants USCIS, Duke, and McCament, through counsel, asserted that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because HKE does not have standing to sue.<\/p>\n<p>Manglona said to establish standing, plaintiffs must show that they have suffered an injury in fact, a sufficient \u201ccausal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of,\u201d and a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision.<\/p>\n<p>Defendants argued that HKE\u2019s allege injuries are not redressible because the one-year time period that the CW-1 petitions covered has already expired.<\/p>\n<p>HKE has never reapplied for CW-1 permits for these workers or petitioned to extend them.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, according to defendants, HKE has not carried its burden to show that a favorable judgment would redress an ongoing injury or a threat of an imminent future injury.<\/p>\n<p>HKE responded that USCIS\u2019 action injured it in two ways, by sullying its reputation and by depriving it of much of its workforce, and that both these injuries are redressible by favorable judicial action.<\/p>\n<p>Manglona said HKE\u2019s claims as to damage because of the denials of their petitions are moot because the time period to which the petitions applied expired long ago.<\/p>\n<p>Manglona said HKE asserts that, \u201cthe decisions designating HKE\u2019s hotel and casino operation as an illegitimate business have not expired and have not been retracted by USCIS.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Manglona said the issue at this stage of the analysis, however, is not whether the decisions have been vacated or \u201cretracted\u201d but whether the benefits period has expired.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt has,\u201d the judge pointed out.<\/p>\n<p>Manglona said the determination that HKE was not a legitimate business is limited to the individual case and does not carry over to future petitions HKE may file.<\/p>\n<p>Manglona said the alleged reputational harm to HKE is truly a \u201cbyproduct\u201d and not a direct result of USCIS action.<\/p>\n<p>The judge said USCIS did not reach out on its own and declare HKE an illegitimate business.<\/p>\n<p>Rather, she said, it followed regulations to determine whether HKE was an eligible employer engaged in legitimate business.  <\/p>\n<p>HKE has blamed USCIS\u2019 stigmatizing the company by designating it as an \u201cillegitimate business\u201d to the deprivation of its foreign workforce that led to the eventual closure of Tinian Dynasty.<\/p>\n<p>HKE counsel George Anthony Long asserted that the stigma prejudiced HKE by severely interfering with the company\u2019s ability to operate its hotel and casino.<\/p>\n<p>In defendants\u2019 reply to HKE\u2019s opposition to the motion to dismiss, U.S. Department of Justice Office of Immigration Litigation trial attorney Heather Sokolower denied that USCIS designate HKE \u201cas an illegitimate business\u201d or ever refer to HKE as an \u201cillegitimate business.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Sokolower said HKE mischaracterizes the agency actions at issue in this case.<\/p>\n<p>According to HKE\u2019s lawsuit, the final USCIS Administrative Appeals Office\u2019s adverse agency decision affirming that the company is not engaged in a legitimate business for CW purposes affects more than three quarters of Tinian Dynasty\u2019s employees.<\/p>\n<p>HKE claimed it has harmed by the agency decision as it materially affects its ability to maintain and continue its business operations. Tinian Dynasty used to employ about 500 foreign contract workers.<\/p>\n<p>Defendants then moved to dismiss the lawsuit for lack of standing and failure to state a claim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Citing the federal court\u2019s lack of jurisdiction, U.S. District Court for the NMI Chief Judge&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[56,1628,259,119],"class_list":["post-261540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news","tag-business-3","tag-hke","tag-lawsuit","tag-uscis"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=261540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/261540\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=261540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=261540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=261540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}