{"id":278172,"date":"2018-06-15T06:00:51","date_gmt":"2018-06-14T20:00:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=278172"},"modified":"2018-06-15T06:00:51","modified_gmt":"2018-06-14T20:00:51","slug":"boe-finds-ex-pss-commissioners-argument-puzzling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/boe-finds-ex-pss-commissioners-argument-puzzling\/","title":{"rendered":"BOE finds ex-PSS commissioner\u2019s argument puzzling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Board of Education and its members are puzzled over the argument of former Public School System commissioner Cynthia I. Deleon Guerrero in her motion that asked the federal court to reconsider its decision to dismiss her claims against the BOE and its members over her termination. <\/p>\n<p>The board and its members, through special assistant attorney general Tiberius D. Mocanu, said Deleon Guerrero argues that she should be entitled to a pre-termination hearing because BOE chair MaryLou S. Ada had stated that she did not get along with her.<\/p>\n<p>Mocanu said that, in her motion for consideration, Deleon Guerrero contests the accuracy of that statement. Mocanu asked how is that even possible.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow could anyone contest the stated subjective feelings of another person? What would the goal of that hearing even be?\u201d the lawyer asked. He urged Deleon Guerrero to produce evidence that Ada did, in fact, get along with her.<\/p>\n<p>The most absurd part of this argument, Mocanu said, is that if Deleon Guerrero succeeds in proving the statement false, it would make her case worse, not better. Meaning if Deleon Guerrero proves she and Ada did get along, then her termination really could not be \u201cfor cause,\u201d let alone an illegal one.<\/p>\n<p> \u201cThey get along, after all,\u201d Mocanu added.<\/p>\n<p>The board and its members do not believe that Deleon Guerrero\u2019s motion for reconsideration raises any new issues of law or posits any argument that would disturb the court\u2019s \u201csound reasoning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>First of all, Deleon Guerrero herself agrees that she is an at-will employee, Mocanu said.<\/p>\n<p>This ends the analysis, he said.<\/p>\n<p>He said the court\u2019s decision and the totality of the federal law stands for the proposition that an at-will employee does not have a property interest sufficient to make out a claim for procedural due process under the 14th Amendment.<\/p>\n<p>The lawyer said Deleon Guerrero\u2019s simple retort is that she had a contract for four years, she was terminated after only one, and that she had a property right in continuing her job for the rest of her term. \u201cThis misses the point,\u201d Mocanu said.<\/p>\n<p>He said Deleon Guerrero\u2019s contract for four years and the accompanying statute creates a term limit on employment, not a guarantee. \u201cIn other words, the four-year term is a ceiling, not a floor,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Mocanu said this is the case because both the contract and the statute contemplate her possible removal prior to the expiration of her term.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, he said, if an \u201cexpectation\u201d analysis is conducted to determine what reasonable expectation Deleon Guerrero had in her continued employment, the answer is simple.<\/p>\n<p>Mocanu said Deleon Guerrero had the expectation that she would serve a term no longer than four years unless reappointed by the board, and that she could be terminated prior to the end of her term\u2014for cause or without cause.<\/p>\n<p>Mocanu said if Deleon Guerrero was terminated without cause, she would be entitled to a lump sum payment of several pay periods.<\/p>\n<p>He said Deleon Guerrero also contends that she was removed \u201cfor cause,\u201d namely that the board stated that they did not get along with her.<\/p>\n<p>Mocanu said all terminations are predicated on a motivation.<\/p>\n<p>He said Deleon Guerrero makes no allegation of discriminatory animus and thus cannot sustain any argument stemming from her claim that the termination was really \u201cfor cause.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Last May 30, U.S. District Court for the NMI Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona dismissed with prejudice Deleon Guerrero\u2019s remaining two claims in her lawsuit: violation of her due process rights and conspiracy to violate her due process rights.<\/p>\n<p>Dismissal with prejudice means Deleon Guerrero can no longer re-file the claims.<\/p>\n<p>Deleon Guerrero then asked the court to reconsider.<\/p>\n<p>Deleon Guerrero, through counsel Brien Sers Nicholas, asserted that the manifest errors of law in her case will make her suffer injustice.<\/p>\n<p>Nicholas argued, among other things, that Deleon Guerrero is entitled to due process as she has a \u201cproperty interest\u201d in her employment.<\/p>\n<p>Deleon Guerrero is suing the board and its members for terminating her as the PSS commissioner last October. She is demanding $350,000 in damages.<\/p>\n<p>Deleon Guerrero claimed that her termination was in retaliation for her questioning BOE\u2019s micromanagement of PSS and her refusal to transfer $175,000 to the board\u2019s account. The BOE has denied the allegations. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Board of Education and its members are puzzled over the argument of former Public&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[39,4325,152,40],"class_list":["post-278172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news","tag-boe","tag-brien-sers-nicholas","tag-deleon-guerrero","tag-pss"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=278172"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/278172\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=278172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=278172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=278172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}