{"id":316581,"date":"2020-01-30T06:00:57","date_gmt":"2020-01-29T20:00:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=316581"},"modified":"2020-01-30T06:00:57","modified_gmt":"2020-01-29T20:00:57","slug":"guam-economy-saw-0-1-growth-in-2019-uog-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/guam-economy-saw-0-1-growth-in-2019-uog-report\/","title":{"rendered":"Guam economy saw 0%-1% growth in 2019\u2014UOG report"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_316608\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-316608\" style=\"width: 2589px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/01\/UOG-report-pix.jpg\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-316608\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Contributors to the 2019 Guam Economic Report released by the University of Guam Regional Center for Public Policy: From left, Luisa V. Tenorio; Prairie Rose Garrido; Sofia Diane Meneses, all research fellows;\u00a0Maria Claret Map\u00e1lad-Ruane,\u00a0lead author and professor of economics; Annette T. Santos, dean of the School of Business and Public Administration; John J. Rivera, director of the Regional Center for Public Policy; Daniel Cayanan; and Jun-Patrick Salalila, both research fellows. (University of Guam)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Guam\u2019s economy for 2019 is expected to post growth of 0% to 1% when the real gross domestic product is officially released by the U.S. Department of Commerce\u2019s Bureau of Economic Analysis this fall. This prediction is part of the University of Guam Regional Center for Public Policy\u2019s 2019 Economic Report completed Dec. 30. The report also predicts a stable 0% to -0.2% growth in 2020.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat, to me, is positive news,\u201d said\u00a0Maria Claret Map\u00e1lad-Ruane, the principal author of the report, who holds a doctorate in economics and is a professor of economics at the university. \u201cTo maintain 0% is great\u2014and it could even be a positive 1% growth\u2014especially since throughout the year, many developments happen that could negatively impact our economy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The report takes into consideration economic factors of the past year, to include employment rates, inflation, GDP, the performance of the key economic drivers of tourism and federal spending, and changes in local and national government policies.\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0<br \/>\n<strong>Slight growth in 2019<\/strong><br \/>\nComparing the 0% to 1% growth prediction to the potential -1% predicted by the center last year, Ruane said the notably strong performance of Guam\u2019s tourism was unexpected,\u00a0with record-breaking arrivals in 2019, including a 25% increase from Japan, and, most importantly, an increase in on-island spending by Japanese visitors and an even larger increase in spending by Korean visitors.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The other contributor to Guam\u2019s economy in 2019 was federal government spending, which increased by more than $200 million in fiscal 2019 compared to fiscal 2018, including the $93 million increase in National Defense Authorization Act funding during the same period.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Slight decline forecasted for 2020<\/strong><br \/>\nThe forecast for 2020 of 0% to -0.2% growth is based on the following assumptions:<\/p>\n<p> \u2022 a modest increase in consumer spending, driven largely by employment opportunities from the 2020 Guam Census and the opening of the Tsubaki Tower;<br \/>\n \u2022 a continued decrease in business spending since 2015, as has been shown in the official Guam GDP estimates by the U.S. Department of Commerce\u2019s Bureau of Economic Analysis. This is primarily due to the uncertainty of bringing in H-2B employees for civilian projects. Some of this could also be due to the continuation of the higher business privilege tax as well as the higher minimum wage;<br \/>\n\u2022 possibly a modest increase in government of Guam spending based on the prediction of increased revenues for fiscal 2020;<br \/>\n\u2022 a significant decrease of $138 million in NDAA funding compared to fiscal 2019; and<br \/>\n\u2022  continued growth in tourism arrivals and on-island spending similar to 2019.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEven if the strong performance in tourism from 2019 is experienced again in 2020, the cutback of $138 million in the NDAA budget will, at best, bring the Guam economy back to 0% or even possibly -0.2% growth in the year 2020,\u201d Ruane said.<\/p>\n<p>Any additional loss of federal funding and\/or visitor spending could worsen this growth forecast, the report states.<\/p>\n<p>Annette T. Santos, dean of the School of Business and Public Administration, which oversees the Regional Center for Public Policy, said, \u201cThis second annual Guam Economic Report is an example of our commitment to empower local and regional stakeholders to achieve greater levels of success through research and scholarly output. We hope that this product will serve as an important resource in key leadership decisions that may affect our island and its future.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Other contributors to the report were research fellows Efigenia Rose Barcinas, Daniel Cayanan, Prairie Rose Garrido, Sofia Diane Meneses, Jun-Patrick Salalila, Kristina C. Sayama, Luisa V. Tenorio, and Angelina T. Tretnoff.<\/p>\n<p>The report may be viewed in full at https:\/\/url.uog.edu\/SKPyXm. <strong>(PR)<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Guam\u2019s economy for 2019 is expected to post growth of 0% to 1% when the&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":315782,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[51,445],"class_list":["post-316581","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business","tag-guam","tag-uog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316581","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=316581"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/316581\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/315782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=316581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=316581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=316581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}