{"id":337500,"date":"2021-01-28T06:05:49","date_gmt":"2021-01-27T20:05:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=337500"},"modified":"2021-01-28T06:05:49","modified_gmt":"2021-01-27T20:05:49","slug":"ipi-chair-claims-ignorance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/ipi-chair-claims-ignorance\/","title":{"rendered":"IPI chair claims ignorance"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Imperial Pacific International (CNMI) LLC board chair Cui Li Jie, through her lawyer, claims she did not fully understand the specifics of the consent judgment that IPI violated or her role as company chairperson.<\/p>\n<p>During a court hearing last week, Cui\u2019s personal lawyer, Juan Lizama, argued that Cui did not know her responsibility as chairperson and did not understand the specifics of the consent judgment.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis isn\u2019t the place she grew up. She\u2019s never experienced how businesses are run here in the United States. If it is that difficult for [former CEO] Donald Browne to stand before the system, you can imagine how difficult it must be for someone like Cui,\u201d Lizama said.<\/p>\n<p>Lizama argued that it\u2019s one thing to know that there\u2019s a consent judgment but it\u2019s another to have the power to ensure that it is not violated.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think it\u2019s one thing to know that there was a judgment. But one thing that was clear here, she\u2019s just the chair lady, she doesn\u2019t have control over the company. She\u2019s not the sole owner, they obviously made her the chair lady but that happens all the time. I think the one thing she doesn\u2019t understand is that as chair, you need to take some responsibility. And I think she\u2019s beginning to realize that. She\u2019s just the chair, she\u2019s not in charge of the operations. Poor lady, she doesn\u2019t even speak English,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_337501\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-337501\" style=\"width: 960px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Cui-Li-Jie-mug.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-large wp-image-337501\" src=\"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/Cui-Li-Jie-mug-1024x531.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"960\" height=\"498\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-337501\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Cui Li Jie<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>However, the U.S. Department of Labor\u2019s senior attorney, Charles Song, insists that it\u2019s only right to find Cui in contempt because not only did she sign the consent judgment on behalf of both IPI and its parent company, Imperial Pacific International Holdings Co. but, according to a previous statement from Browne, Cui was also the one who told Browne to rescind a prior stop-work order.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe request to extend the contempt finding against [Cui] individually because she signed the consent judgment on behalf of both IPI and the holding company. For her attorney to represent that she doesn\u2019t know what\u2019s going on with IPI CNMI just doesn\u2019t strike us as accurate. Mr. Browne\u2019s declaration clearly states that she did know what was going on, and she was the one that ordered him to rescind the stop-work order,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>Currently, IPI, IPIH, and Cui were found in contempt for violating a consent judgment that they signed back in April 2019 stating that they would pay back wages owed former employees that date back 2016 and 2017 worth over $2 million.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, a contempt order was also issued against IPI, IPIH, and Cui for violating the Fair Labor Standards Act when they continued to let their employees work without pay throughout 2020 and let their employees live in company-owned housing that had no power or water.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Imperial Pacific International (CNMI) LLC board chair Cui Li Jie, through her lawyer, claims she&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":337501,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[94],"tags":[12497],"class_list":["post-337500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-headlines","tag-ipi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=337500"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/337500\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/337501"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=337500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=337500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=337500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}