{"id":340687,"date":"2021-03-23T06:00:52","date_gmt":"2021-03-22T20:00:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=340687"},"modified":"2021-03-23T06:00:52","modified_gmt":"2021-03-22T20:00:52","slug":"dcrm-assesses-6k-penalty-vs-gppc-k-parts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/dcrm-assesses-6k-penalty-vs-gppc-k-parts\/","title":{"rendered":"DCRM assesses $6K penalty vs GPPC\/K-Parts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Bureau of Environmental and Coastal Quality\u2019s Division of Coastal Resources Management has assessed a $6,0000 penalty against GPPC Inc.\/K-Parts through a consent order entered on March 17, 2021. <\/p>\n<p>In its enforcement notice on Feb. 9, 2021, DCRM alleged that K-Parts, a subsidiary of GPPC, Inc., sold graded material from a project site in Gualo Rai without a valid DCRM permit and, in doing so, participated in an unauthorized quarrying activity. A quarry is a \u201cmajor siting\u201d that must be permitted prior to commencement of quarrying activity. The parties entered into a consent order as a good faith settlement of the enforcement issue. The consent order is not considered an admission of a violation. The penalty has been paid to the CNMI Department of Finance. <\/p>\n<p>Compliance with permitting requirements is critical to ensuring that development of all projects located in an area of particular concern or constitute a \u201cmajor siting\u201d does not have an adverse impact on the CNMI\u2019s coastal resources. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cDCRM is pleased that the parties were able to resolve this enforcement issue without the time and expense of a formal enforcement hearing, and hopes news of this settlement will remind all developers in the CNMI to obtain a permit from DCRM before starting any regulated activity,\u201d said DCRM enforcement officer Tom Pangelinan. <\/p>\n<p>DCRM\u2019s permitting regulations can be found on cnmilaw.org in Chapter 15-20 of the Administrative Code. Additional information and guidance can be found on DCRM\u2019s website at www.dcrm.gov.mp. (PR)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Bureau of Environmental and Coastal Quality\u2019s Division of Coastal Resources Management has assessed a&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":330355,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[1049],"class_list":["post-340687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-local-news","tag-dcrm"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=340687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/340687\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/330355"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=340687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=340687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=340687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}