{"id":355660,"date":"2021-11-12T06:02:34","date_gmt":"2021-11-11T20:02:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/?p=355660"},"modified":"2021-11-12T06:02:34","modified_gmt":"2021-11-11T20:02:34","slug":"supreme-court-takes-up-equality-issue-in-us-territories-justices-show-few-answers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/supreme-court-takes-up-equality-issue-in-us-territories-justices-show-few-answers\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court takes up equality issue in US territories; justices show few answers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>
Former Guam delegate Madeleine\u00a0Bordallo, along with other current and former residents of U.S. territories, pose in front of the Supreme\u00a0Court as part of Equally American’s\u00a0\u201cI am Jos\u00e9\u201d campaign. (CHANTALE WONG PHOTOGRAPHY)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Supreme Court was asked Wednesday to consider what four words emblazoned on the front of the court\u2014\u201cEqual Justice Under Law\u201d\u2014mean for the 3.5 million citizens living in U.S. territories. At issue was whether the denial of Supplemental Security Income benefits to Jos\u00e9 L. Vaello Madero based solely on his place of residence in Puerto Rico violated the Constitution\u2019s guarantee of equal protection. Two lower courts ruled favorably for Vaello Madero, but it was unclear after oral argument whether the Supreme Court would affirm or reverse those decisions.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe argument was much farther ranging than I expected,\u201d said Neil Weare, president and founder of Equally American, which advocates for equal rights for citizens in U.S. territories and filed an\u00a0amicus brief\u00a0in the case. \u201cWe weren\u2019t given a lot in the way of answers on what most of the justices were thinking. It was clear that many of them were still thinking through\u2014sometimes out loud\u2014what they wanted to do in the case.\u201d<\/p>\n

The strongest voice in favor of Vaello Madero was Justice Sonia Sotomayor, whose parents are from Puerto Rico. She explained to her colleagues that \u201cPuerto Ricans are citizens, and the Constitution applies to them. Their needy people are being treated different than the needy people in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Northern Mariana Islands.\u201d She emphasized again later, \u201cNeedy is needy, whether in Puerto Rico or in the mainland.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cJustice Sotomayor explained in simple and plain terms why where one lives\u2014standing alone\u2014cannot be a basis to deny a U.S. citizen equal enjoyment of a uniform federal benefit like SSI,\u201d Weare said.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0Insular Cases\u2014a series of\u00a0Plessy-era decisions that established a doctrine of \u201cseparate and unequal status\u201d for residents of U.S. territories\u2014were also a significant focus of the argument. After deputy solicitor general Curtis Gannon disclaimed any reliance by the government on the\u00a0Insular Cases, Justice Neil Gorsuch responded, \u201cWhy shouldn’t we just admit the Insular Cases were incorrectly decided?\u201d When Mr. Gannon declined to answer directly, Gorsuch pressed further: \u201cFrom the government’s point of view, if the Insular Cases are wrong\u2026why shouldn’t we just say what everyone knows to be true?\u201d In response, while Gannon stated that \u201csome of the reasoning and rhetoric [of the\u00a0Insular Cases] is obviously anathema, has been for decades, if not from the outset,\u201d he declined the opportunity to call on the Supreme Court to overrule the\u00a0Insular Cases.<\/p>\n

Weare said, \u201cWe\u2019ve been calling on the Supreme Court to overrule the\u00a0Insular Cases\u00a0for years, so I was pleased to hear Justice Gorsuch call out the\u00a0Insular Cases\u00a0so directly. It was disappointing, though, that even after Justice Gorsuch opened the door for the government to walk through, they refused to take that step. In effect, the Biden-Harris Justice Department is continuing to defend the\u00a0Insular Cases, which is hard to square with the values they profess to adhere to.\u201d<\/p>\n

With the Supreme Court still closed to the public due to COVID-19, Equally American brought together supporters from several U.S. territories as part of its \u201cI am Jos\u00e9\u201d campaign\u00a0to listen to the arguments outside the court while holding signs demanding action by the court and Congress. Among those attending were former Guam delegate Madeleine Bordallo and staff from current Guam Delegate Michael F.Q. San Nicolas, among many others.<\/p>\n

“The big takeaway today should be that we need to continue pushing decisionmakers in [Washington,] D.C. to address these historic injustices, which are grounded in systemic racism,” Weare said. “Now that the case for equality has been made to the Supreme Court, we need to shift our focus to Congress, where the extension of SSI benefits to citizens in the territories has been included by House Democrats in the draft budget reconciliation bill. Getting that across the finish line will be hard work over the next few weeks, but we can’t lose focus.”<\/p>\n

A\u00a0new poll\u00a0released yesterday shows that U.S. voters support expanding SSI benefits to citizens in the territories by a 45 point margin, with 69% supporting and only 24% opposing.<\/p>\n

People from the territories whose lives have been impacted by the denial of SSI benefits are encouraged to continue sharing their stories with Equally American at\u00a0https:\/\/www.equalrightsnow.org\/ssisurvey. So far nearly 200 people have taken the survey.<\/p>\n

A decision in the case is not expected until later next year. More information on\u00a0U.S. v. Vaello Madero, including links to the transcript and audio of the oral argument, is available at\u00a0https:\/\/www.equalrightsnow.org\/vaello_madero. More about the \u201cI am Jos\u00e9\u201d campaign is available at\u00a0https:\/\/www.equalrightsnow.org\/iamjose. (PR)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Supreme Court was asked Wednesday to consider what four words emblazoned on the front…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":355661,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[139,320],"class_list":["post-355660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-local-news","tag-supreme-court","tag-us"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=355660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/355660\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/355661"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=355660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=355660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=355660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}