{"id":48066,"date":"1999-09-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-09-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/94f95d5b-1dfb-11e4-aedf-250bc8c9958e"},"modified":"1999-09-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"1999-09-17T00:00:00","slug":"94f95d6f-1dfb-11e4-aedf-250bc8c9958e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/94f95d6f-1dfb-11e4-aedf-250bc8c9958e\/","title":{"rendered":"Nikko seeks dismissal of lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When a security guard\u2013 whose job is presumed to be a twin of risk\u2014 is killed in line of duty, should his employer be held liable for his death?<\/p>\n<p>This question is the subject of debate between the attorneys for Hotel Nikko and the family of a Filipino security guard who died in 1996 while on duty.<\/p>\n<p>Bernardo Tique was beaten to death at the Hotel Nikko on Dec. 1, 1996 while trying to pacify two drunken men who plunged into the hotel&#8217;s swimming pool. The two were hanging out at the hotel premises although they were not registered guests.<\/p>\n<p>Tique died while being treated at St. Luke&#8217;s Medical Center  in the Philippines.<\/p>\n<p>His family sued Nikko for alleged negligence.<\/p>\n<p>Hotel Nikko, represented by lawyers from Mair Mair Spade &#038; Thompson, has asked the Superior Court to dismiss the case on summary judgment, arguing that the hotel &#8220;breached no duty to him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The settled rule, both in the CNMI and elsewhere, is that the security guard&#8217;s assumption of the risk in his employment frees the employer or principal from any duty of care,&#8221; attorneys for Nikko said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As an experienced security guard,&#8221; they added, &#8220;Tique was aware of the nature and extent of these risks and he was fatally injured by the very danger that he was hired to safeguard against.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Nikko&#8217;s attorneys also pointed out that the hotel management had delegated responsibility for security of the hotel to its independent contractor, Island Security Service.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The settled law of the Commonwealth is that such security duties may be delegated and the principal, as a matter of law, is thereby relieved of liability of any alleged negligence involving the conduct of such security,&#8221; Nikko said.<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers for the Tique family opposed Nikko&#8217;s motion for summary judgment, maintaining that a hotel&#8217;s duty of ordinary care toward its security guards was not completely invalidated by their agreement to assume some risk in enforcing security at the establishment.<\/p>\n<p>Michael Dotts,  attorney for the Tique family, said Hotel Nikko&#8217;s &#8220;no-weapon policy&#8221; could be blamed for Tique&#8217;s death.<\/p>\n<p>He argued that Tique might not have been killed had  Nikko allowed its security guards to carry weapons with which they can defend themselves from any attack.<\/p>\n<p>Dotts also said that Nikko should be faulted for selling alcoholic drinks to the two men who killed Tique or &#8220;even for allowing them to consume it and become violent on the premises&#8221; despite the fact they were not registered guests.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Many courts have upheld contractee liability against hotels for the security guards&#8217; injuries caused by risk which were created by the hotel and not voluntarily assumed by the security guard,&#8221; Dotts said. (MCM)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When a security guard\u2013 whose job is presumed to be a twin of risk\u2014 is killed in line of duty, should his employer be held liable for his death?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48066"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48066\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}