{"id":55413,"date":"2001-01-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2001-01-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/969202df-1dfb-11e4-aedf-250bc8c9958e"},"modified":"2001-01-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2001-01-03T00:00:00","slug":"969202f3-1dfb-11e4-aedf-250bc8c9958e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/969202f3-1dfb-11e4-aedf-250bc8c9958e\/","title":{"rendered":"The rise and fall of the cyber empire"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>One of Saipan&#8217;s blessings is our lack of yuppies.  And, by extension, you&#8217;re comparatively unlikely to be inflicted with some dreadful bore at a cocktail party bragging about how much money he just made in his dot-com stock portfolio.<\/p>\n<p>Come to think of it, I&#8217;m not aware that we have many cocktail parties in the first place.  Bud Lite seems to be favored over martinis.<\/p>\n<p>Anyway, if\u2013despite the odds\u2013some braggart was trying to convince you what a stock market whiz he was, he might have since slinked into a nice warm, dry dumpster along with his boonie dog roommates.  He may be homeless.  A lot of the dot-com crowd got wiped out financially over the past 10 months, and the &#8220;dot-com crash&#8221; is THE financial story of the year.<\/p>\n<p>If you don&#8217;t like the term &#8220;crash,&#8221; then you can try an alliterative flair and go for &#8220;dot-com depression,&#8221; which is a phrase now making the rounds.<\/p>\n<p>Yeah, I&#8217;d be depressed too if I bought into the Nasdaq (the home of most dot-com stocks) when it hit its peak in March, 2000, only to watch it plunge\u2013ready for this?\u201350.6 percent since.<\/p>\n<p>A lot of stocks are down 90 percent from their peaks.  The only one of the bunch I&#8217;m following\u2013not buying, mind you, nor wasting any breath on, but just sort of following as a spectator sport\u2013peaked at about $45 a share a couple of years ago.  It&#8217;s now trading at about a buck and change.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, if you had &#8220;invested&#8221; (speculated? Bet? Got suckered?) $10,000 in it when it hit peak, your ten grand commitment would be worth about $264 today.<\/p>\n<p>Your prototypical, down in the dumps dot-com loser stock represented a share in a company that never\u2013ever\u2013made a profit.   You couldn&#8217;t calculate the &#8220;price to earnings&#8221; ratio, since there were no earnings.  There weren&#8217;t, of course, any dividends, either.  All there was, it seems, was the faint hope that you could find a sucker willing to pay more money for the stock than you did.  This is known as the Greater Fool theory, which is probably a legitimate element in a lot of investments, but makes a poor substitute for economic reality.<\/p>\n<p>And, speaking of reality, three points come to mind:<\/p>\n<p>First, there&#8217;s the issue of whether or not the dot-com depression will drag down the rest of the market, and, by extension, might mess up the economy as a whole.   Sez me: I dunno.<\/p>\n<p>Second, there&#8217;s the fact that if the Federal Reserve lowers interest rates, as its widely expected to do, I wouldn&#8217;t expect the dot-com sector to necessarily benefit from it substantially.  One of things that lower interest rates do is increase today&#8217;s value of a company&#8217;s future earnings, which is moot if the company won&#8217;t have any earnings to begin with.<\/p>\n<p>And, third, let&#8217;s count our blessings that we don&#8217;t have to live in the middle of the whine-fest that is rolling like thunder through stock-crazed middle America.  Americans whine too much as it is, and the less we have to hear of it, the better.<\/p>\n<p>Ed Stephens, Jr. is an economist and columnist for the Saipan Tribune.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of Saipan&#8217;s blessings is our lack of yuppies.  And, by extension, you&#8217;re comparatively unlikely to be inflicted with some dreadful bore at a cocktail party bragging about how much money he just made in his dot-com stock portfolio.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-local-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55413"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55413\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.saipantribune.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}