Saturation patrols more effective

Posted on Aug 21 2011

Sobriety checkpoints—like the ones planned on Tinian—often fail to make even a single drunk driving arrest, despite stopping hundreds of vehicles (“Sobriety checkpoints on Tinian,” Aug. 19). A 2009 University of Maryland study found that checkpoints don’t have “any impact on public perceptions, driver behaviors, or alcohol-related crashes, police citations for impaired driving, and public perceptions of alcohol-impaired driving risk.”

County police should employ roving—or saturation—patrols in which police patrol the roadways for dangerous drivers. State Supreme Court cases from both Pennsylvania and New Hampshire revealed that roving patrols caught 10 times more drunk drivers than checkpoints. According to the FBI “it is proven that saturation efforts will bring more DUI arrests than sobriety checkpoints.” Patrols also stop distracted, speeding, aggressive, and drowsy drivers because officers can catch them in the act.

[B]Sarah Longwell
[/B][I]Managing Director
American Beverage Institute
Washington, D.C.[/I]

Masufan kuttura yan tradision

Cop in alleged domestic spat had two prior criminal cases

Disclaimer: Comments are moderated. They will not appear immediately or even on the same day. Comments should be related to the topic. Off-topic comments would be deleted. Profanities are not allowed. Comments that are potentially libelous, inflammatory, or slanderous would be deleted.