June 23, 2025

‘Is’ in ISIS and Isis

It is mooncake day in China, practiced widely by exchanging cakes. Xi Jinping is curtailing the corruption it spawned. We are lauding the effort, but we will go directly to Obama’s IS-cake.

ISIS is a terrorist group by the western media, a “terrorist” defined as anyone against the U.S. started during the War on Terror by Cheney and company while George II Bush sat upfront.

With the emergence of Sunni and Shia fundamentalists, the word “terrorist” was further refined to be synonymous to “Islam,” unless one is a sheik with oil under his control available and accessible to refinery and shipping lords, in which case, he is a Muslim of dawa (social services), a friend of the Red Crescent!

The Brits called American militia in Boston terrorists, too, in the same way as the Han brands fiery Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and Kyrgyz as waging a war on terror. The Zang of Xizang self-immolate with gas sans explosives but Vietnam takes moveable oil derricks near their shore as unfriendly and light up their Mahayana gas on plants and factories of foreign investors. Historically, Yue of Indochina is not friendly to Han, cousin of old Chang’an.

Chinese derisively refer to any Japanese as a bandit (wokou), more so now that Shinzo Abe drums up Nippon militarism. Manchukuo memory in Manchurian consciousness is aflame again. China recently played up the lessons it learned from Meiji Japan’s aggressions. That marquee will play awhile.

Current mythmakers/destroyers cornered themselves into calling the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria by the acronym ISIS. The Egyptian goddess Isis played a very prominent role in the history of Egypt down to the much-adored mother and child motif in Rome.

Isis was the consort of Osiris who birthed the powerful god Horus, later decried by missionaries as a pagan whore! Isis enabled the resurrection of Osiris when the latter was dismembered to death; we hear echoes of that in the empty tomb of Gethsemani evolving into bodily resurrection. The image of Isis suckling Horus is no less than the revered Christian picture of Mary suckling the infant Jesus!

ISIS is the hand behind journalists Farley and Sotloff’s head losses, becoming the demonized dartboard of the U.S.and Israel; ISIS is not a foreign child to a suckling American Madonna. An inheritor of the al-Qaeda mantle, ISIS directly leads to the mujahedeen we armed against the Russians in the Khyber Pass from whom one of its famous practitioners was Saudi Osama bin Laden. (ISIS is now also called ISIL as the Islamic State in the Levant!)

The Levant gave us Moses of the Zion of Eretz Israel, Paul of Tarsus whose efforts led to the idolatry of Iesu, and the transcendent mystery of the no-thing al-lah from the vision of the Prophet in the desert. Gaza paid dearly to the sacrificial altars of Abram recently. Christian soldiers are again crusading to war, while Mahmoud’s followers assert themselves in the politics of oil. No one has clean hands. Like Vietnam’s Montagnards who scrambled when U.S. forces pulled out, the Yazidi of Iraq is seen as enemies of Islam in their collaboration with the infidels against Sharia law! For Hamas’ trigger happy ways, Israel just land grabbed 4 square km. of Palestinian land!

Since the earthrise of ‘68, I appropriated the gifts of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, and moved on. n my time, the planet birthed democracy’s promise of universal suffrage, a communist culture in search of justice, and socialist economics of promised equity that hover over the industrialization of the planet in obeisance to oil. The health of our finances is measured on the rise and fall of the traded commodity. It is also the basis of the local conflicts that flares now and then around pumps and refineries in Sudan, the whole Near East, and South China Sea.

We know of conservative socialist democrat Obama, and Deng Xiaoping, the free enterprise socialist with unadulterated Chinese characteristics bent on reform-and-opening-up of the bamboo curtain. The capitalist-socialist-communist spectrum shades my time and I judge the value of any system on its workable combination in bringing justice and welfare to common folks.

Cui niu bi is a “dirty” word in Chinese, used on one who talks big but no one believes. ISIS threatens U.S. Obama and U.K. Cameron. They’ve been posturing to do something about it.

What has become clear now is that the terrorist/liberator divide is not a useful dichotomy as one’s terrorist is another’s liberator. Indeed, in many parts of the world, the Caucasian soldier and those under its command are regarded as terrorists. One Kievan Rus unreported aspect of Ukraine is its “Christian” root; the separatists from eastern Ukraine are pro-Russians so they are “terrorists”.

Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba of the U.S. Armed Forces investigated the Abu Graib tortures and told the Senate Armed Services Committee of findings. He was ordered to retire shortly thereafter. Liberating U.S. warriors have been determined practitioners of terror. Ask Congress. And Taguba.

0 thoughts on “‘Is’ in ISIS and Isis

  1. I just briefed through this garbage. What are suggesting, we need to hate China, Israel, America, U.K.?
    AND support ISIS?
    I don’t think so, dude.

  2. Really, I am finding it increasingly difficult to find any meaning in Vergara’s glib, pseudo-historical, moral-relativist, Anti-American meanderings. The Trib has an editor, and these columns are in need of one.

  3. It would be nice to know where Saipanuvian and born american differ in their opinions from mine but I suppose it is easier to condemn from behind an email address. I do have an email address at the bottom of the column, and I am not out to convince anyone though I do write an Opinion column. In any case, Obama is the socialist in the White House, and Mitt Romney is the Liberal Republican who thinks he will do better than Hillary, and we will not rehears what names we’ve heard Hillary and our own Ambrose has been called, and I am at best, anti-American. One of my readers say DisqUs is the discourse format of the future, and I am game. Oh, BTW, ST edits form and sometimes, syntax, but content is usually up to the writer. I suppose, that’s why it is called an Opinion page!

  4. Well, Mr. Vergara, let’s start from the proposition that a “terrorist” is anyone who was against Bush and Cheney’s War on Terror. Do you really believe that? If so, I question your credentials as a historian. Don’t you remember the attacks against the twin towers and the pentagon, the massive loss of life, the Taliban harboring UBL? Were those acts committed by people who simply had an honest policy disagreement with Bush and Cheney? No. Nor is the current stripe of terrorist, ISIS, beheading American journalists, and engaged in sectarian violence on a grand scale. You might think that your glib observations pass for sophistication, but they don’t. They reveal you as a lazy thinker, with uncritical assessments of world events. Please, Mr. Vergara, don’t go for the easy analysis. You are obviously well-read and articulate. Give your readers facts that they can use in forming an opinion, the insight you have gained as a student and teacher of history, and encourage them to think for themselves.

  5. Buenas Mr. Vergara,
    In the first place why did the Bush’s and Cheney’s Administration wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussien of Iraq? Who benefitted the most in a sense of the dollar sigh when we got involved with Iraq and Afghanistan? Billions of dollars went to the companies or corporations who had links to our so call vice-president who wants to get rid of the terrorists world wide.

    The biggest mistake that Bush II did was to get rid of Saddam, because he had been the figure in the area that had kept the area stabilized for decades. What the United States had done was agitate the big red ants from their nest. Since the beginning of mankind, the Mideast is a hot spot for religious fanatics and we should leave such area alone.

    I had travelled to many places on this earth, and at times we Americans are being level as terrorist by other nationality, because we always try to instill our believes upon them, either by force or by indirect influence. For example, do we have the right to enter another country and tell them not to enforce their believes or their Islamic believes on their culture and they are going to pay the price.

    The Iraq and Afghanistan wars were almost the same as the Vietnam conflict, because the United States went in, in the pretense to help the country and in the middle of the heat we pack up leave.

    Iraq was not invaded by the United States because of the Twin Towers predicaments, but it was invaded to benefit the rich corporations in a form of contracts and subcontract from the military and the vast amount of oil or for greed.

    Mr. Vergara, many of us read your column each and every week and we appreciate your insight of the world. We don’t see you as being anti-America, we see you as being a good American for expressing your opinions with no string attach. In America, you can’t please everyone and that is one good thing about America. Keep up the good work.

    Si Yu’us Ma’ase

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.