October 12, 2025

Crisostomo brings up 4 issues in his appeal

Joseph Acosta Crisostomo, a habitual offender who is serving life imprisonment for kidnapping, raping, killing, and robbing bartender Emerita R. Romero, has brought up four issues in his appeal to the CNMI Supreme Court.

Crisostomo, through counsel Janet H. King, is appealing to reverse Superior Court Associate Judge Joseph N. Camacho’s judgment of conviction issued on April 28, 2014, sentencing order entered on May 28, 2014, and two-pretrial orders.

The pre-trial orders subject on Crisostomo’s appeal are Camacho’s order issued on Sept. 11, 2013, that denied defendant’s motion to change trial venue, and the judge’s order entered on Sept. 12, 2013 that denied defendant’s motion to suppress pretrial identification in which Joanne Castro identified the voice of Crisostomo, her former common-law husband for 17 years, on a 911 audio recording.

A check with the Supreme Court files yesterday showed that except for the notice of appeal, neither King nor the CNMI government has yet to file briefs.

Crisostomo, 41, is currently appealing two other sentences that he is serving in two criminal cases.

In Romero’s case, on April 24, 2014, a jury returned a guilty verdict against Crisostomo on the charges of first degree murder, kidnapping, sexual assault in the first degree, and robbery. Camacho found him guilty of assault and battery, and disturbing the peace.

Romero, 37, was last seen boarding into a car near her house in Garapan in the early morning of Feb. 5, 2012. Two days later, Federal Bureau of Investigation agents found her body in a small room at an abandoned La Fiesta Mall in San Roque/As Matuis. Autopsy showed she was beaten up and strangled to death with a pair of leggings.

0 thoughts on “Crisostomo brings up 4 issues in his appeal

  1. The question is, on ALL of this guys more than 20+ court cases over the years which Judge(s) kept turning him loose or handed out lenient sentences that allowed him to remain on the streets to continue to complete crimes and this murder and suspected other murders? This could be conceived as due to his family name and connection.
    This is the type of actions that should be looked at when these judges are up for retention votes.

  2. Family name? Who in this life could possibly abet or support this human? Much less, time and again to this point. Take us back please, what was the punishment for such a crime BEFORE the US became the justice system? Were there 20+ years of appeals and motions involved? Imprisoned for life for the taking of a life? Who was the first one in the now CNMI to enjoy such a deal? Was there a prison for lifers or something shorter?

Leave a Reply to Saipanshipguy Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.