July 10, 2025

Radich couple now looking forward to own handgun

U.S. Navy veteran David J. Radich and his wife, Li-Rong, are now looking forward to being able to own a handgun in the Commonwealth, according to their counsel, Daniel Guidotti.

In an interview yesterday, Guidotti said he believes that U.S. District Court for the NMI Chief Judge Ramona V. Manglona made the right ruling and that his clients are happy with the results of their lawsuit.

Guidotti said Manglona’s ruling was in line with the rights granted to the people of the CNMI under the U.S. Constitution and the Covenant particularly Section 501 (a).

As to some CNMI residents’ comment on social media, expressing their disappointment with the ruling and blaming the Radich couple, the lawyer said he has no comment as “that’s beyond what’s appropriate.”

Guidotti added that he advised his clients not to speak to the media about the issue.

Asked for comment about Manglona’s ruling, Attorney General Edward Manibusan said yesterday that for over 40 years, the Commonwealth Weapons Act has protected the people of the CNMI for gun violence.

Manibusan said in light of Manglona’s decision in Radich lawsuit, his office will continue to ensure the safety and security of the people of the Commonwealth.

The AG said they have been working with Gov. Ralph DLG. Torres and the Legislature in crafting legislation on the use and possession of firearms consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Heller.

“That legislation with a section by section analysis is now before the Legislature for its consideration and action,” Manibusan said.

In the District of Columbia v. Heller case, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the operative clause of the Second Amendment—“the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”—guarantees “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.”

Applying that individual right, the Supreme Court struck down a District of Columbia ban on the “possession of usable handguns in the home.”

Manglona has declared unconstitutional the CNMI gun’s control law that prohibits all residents from obtaining handguns for self-defense purposes.

Manglona ruled that the handgun and handgun ammunition and their import ban contained in the provisions of the CNMI Weapons Control Act are declared unconstitutional and in violation of the Covenant that incorporated the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Manglona issued the ruling favorable to the Radich couple, who have filed a lawsuit against then-Department of Public Safety commissioner James C. Deleon Guerrero and Department of Finance Secretary Larrisa Larson, that challenges the constitutionality of the CNMI Weapons Control Act that prohibits all residents from obtaining handguns for self-defense purposes.

According to the complaint, in 2010, while Mr. Radich was away and his wife, Li-Rong, was at home alone on Saipan, their house was invaded.

Li-Rong was attacked and beaten up resulting in serious injuries. She screamed out for help, prompting the invader to leave.

The couple applied for weapons permit in July 2013. No permit has been granted.

0 thoughts on “Radich couple now looking forward to own handgun

  1. It’s unfortunate that Mrs. Radish was physically assaulted and hope that your assailant pays for his crime but now that you have the right to own a gun make sure it does not become your eventual downfall.

    1. What a cruel comment! His wife was physically assaulted in her own home! It could happen to anyone. CNMI law did not allow handguns for self-defense, making law-abiding citizens vulnerable to such heinous crimes.

      1. I highly doubt that Mrs. Radich having a gun would have changed her situation unless it was loaded, ready accessible or on her person at the time. It might have also been used against her.

  2. So what protected the people before the handgun ban? Nothing. and there was no difference in the crime rate before and after. The law had little effect, except to trample on the rights of Northern Mariana Island residents.

    Crime rates do not depend on instruments. They depend on culture. To focus on instruments is to remove the responsibility from the criminals.

  3. The good ‘ol U.S. Constitution…some apply to us, some don’t, because to America, we are 3rd class citizens, so their 1st class citizens move here, force their needs and wants upon us, then when sh*&^ hits the fan, they get out of here and leave us to clean up their mess.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.