Petition vs military plans passes 68,000 signatures

The electronic petition initiated by Arley and Phillip Long and promoted by many women in the Tinian community and endorsed by the CNMI and Guam community coalitions has now garnered over 68,000 signatures that oppose the military’s plans to bomb the islands of Tinian and Pagan. The hugely successful petition has garnered vast support from several organizations across the U.S. such as Earth Justice, the Center for Biological Diversity, Save the Beach, and many others around the globe.

The online petition seeks to stop the U.S. military’s proposed live fire training on Tinian and Pagan. Actions, at the military’s own admission, must require the forced relocation of both Tinian and Pagan residents from the proposed bombing areas. The military’s proposed actions are detailed in the CNMI Joint Military Training EIS/OEIS document:

Krissy Cepeda shows off one of the T-shirts that call for the preservation of Pagan and Tinian. (Contributed Photo)

Krissy Cepeda shows off one of the T-shirts that call for the preservation of Pagan and Tinian. (Contributed Photo)

On Tinian the military’s plan calls for high hazard impact areas, convoy courses, convoy course engagement areas, tracked vehicle driver’s courses, landing zones, observation posts, surface radar sites, tactical amphibious landing beaches, maneuver areas, field artillery, indirect fire ranges, base camp, and hazardous munitions (weapons) storage areas.

On Pagan, the military proposes high-hazard impact areas, expeditionary base camp/bivouac areas, tactical amphibious landing beaches, expeditionary airfield, military training trail networks, south range complex, north range complex, which includes landing zones, firing positions and target areas as well as hazardous munitions (weapons) storage areas and supply routes.

The U.S. military also says in its proposed action that permanent and unrepairable impacts (significant) damage will be done to the CNMI. The military’s EIS admits the closure and proposed future control over the CNMI airspace and the destruction of CNMI cultural resources. They acknowledge the poisoning of the geology and soil on Tinian and Pagan, the creation of noise at all hours of the day and night, the limitation of access to CNMI lands and submerged land use, the loss of access to Tinian and Pagan recreation, hunting, and cultural areas. Moreover, the military admits that there will be huge losses of wildlife on Tinian and Pagan, and significant losses of marine wildlife off the waters of Tinian and Pagan.

The military also acknowledges that there will be significant losses, such as the impact to tourism growth on Tinian and Pagan. Lastly, they admit to the stunning negative visual impacts in bombing the northern part of Tinian and the effects it will have on the southern residents and tourists of Saipan.

The online petition,, is pushing for a broad grassroots effort throughout the United States in order to garner 100,000 signatures for a formal petition to the White House. The U.S. White House has a standing policy that the U.S. President will address directly any petition of 100,000 or more that is sent to the White House.

“The online petition is now just 32,000 signatures away from that goal and it needs your help to stop the massive proposed destruction by the U.S. military,” the petition’s organizers said.

Supporters of the petition have clarified their position as “staunch patriots and strong advocates for U.S. veterans and the United States.” They want to make it clear that their position against the military’s proposed action is simply that. They are against the implementation of a hazardous high impact bombing range on Tinian and Pagan. The supporters are against the military’s proposed action of the forced relocation of island residents, the destruction of the environment, the killing of wildlife and sea life, and the termination of a tourism-based economy on the two islands.

Arley Long, the primary advocate behind the electronic petition on, said: “I am overwhelmed with excitement and feel we do stand together in protecting these beautiful Islands. I would like to thank numerous groups globally, and residents living on and off island that have been great supporters by sharing this petition and writing to the press in their regions as well.”

“A special thank you to my husband Phil Long, Sylvia Frain, Andrew, and Jason Barnaby from, Jude Hudson, attorney Lisa Brownee, Juanita Mendiola, Cinta Kaipat, Robert Rabin, and Rosalgia Alvarez from Puerto Rico. With all this help we’re still not done. Please keep sharing this petition, and writing to the president,” she added.

For more information, visit: or use the hashtags: #SaveTinian #SavePagan or #OurIslandsAreSacred.

ShareTweet about this on TwitterShare on Facebook0Share on Google+0Share on LinkedIn0Pin on Pinterest0Share on Tumblr0Email this to someonePrint this page
Press Release
News under Press Release are official statements issued to Saipan Tribune giving information on a particular matter.

Related Posts

  • RCGuam

    Not wanting to burst anyone’s bubble but here are some facts about online petitions. In order to get an official Whitehouse response to a petition the petition must garner 100,000 signatures within the first 30 days. And this is for petitions posted on the Official Whitehouse website. Please review the following link and scroll to the bottom of the page to see the threshold requirement.

    The problem I see is that the petition that everyone has been signing is 1) not on the official Whitehouse website and 2) is now over 30 days old having yet passed the 100,000 signature threshold. It is now at 75,000 plus. That is not to say the petition won’t be submitted eventually but the Whitehouse does not have to and most likely will not respond to it.

    Online petitions are an easy way for someone to feel good about themselves by
    not doing anything of real substance. Petitions are also not taken seriously because they are so easy to sign without thinking. Look at these petitions that did actually meet the Whitehouse’s requirements for a response. and

    These two petitions had more online support than the petition against having Ranges on Tinian and Pagan. If you really want to have an impact on the proposed ranges provide written responses to the DEIS instead. Keep angry words and speculation out of the response and stick to clear facts if you want to be taken seriously. You can also write your local politicians and write to your
    Congressman. This type of response will have a much greater effect than a

    Finally, I recommend you do this no matter your position on the Ranges. For or Against.

    • Juanita Mendiola

      Do not worry your confused head over such trivial matter. We know what we are doing, Thank you though for sharing the information,

      • RCGuam

        You are welcome. I was so worried. But I feel better now knowing you have a plan.

    • jun

      Buenas RCGuam,

      We had a gathering over the weekend and the topic of military build up in the CNMI was brought up. Why do we go against progress in the CNMI is the question of the week?

      We strongly agree with your opinion above.

Disclaimer: Comments are moderated. They will not appear immediately or even on the same day. Comments should be related to the topic. Off-topic comments would be deleted. Profanities are not allowed. Comments that are potentially libelous, inflammatory, or slanderous would be deleted.