Genesis of soured NMI-Fed relationship

By
|
Posted on Aug 16 1999
Share

The so-called “social democrats” (Clinton administration et al) believe in controlling our country from A-Z. It’s for this reason that they’re canvassing the country to trumpet their message of more social programs.

Their ulterior motive is to keep most of the projected budget surplus in the coffers of the federal government so they can spend your money claiming they KNOW BEST. The ultimate goal is CONTROL of your livelihood. It seems a proposal to gradually turn the tide of freedom to dictatorship.

To ascertain the attainment of their ultimate goal, these social democrats would employ and twist words to make you believe that they mean what they say when in fact theirs is the clever employment of the concept of ambiguity. In other words, when you take them to task on specific aspects of their statements, they simply spin the truth further into additional piles of lies, smiling with thick hair and perfect set of teeth. They make you listen to how they say it, not what they say.

It’s an interesting specter when viewed from the standpoint of how we engaged in a vitriolic tango and strive with the Pinto Boys’ Plumbers Unit. I mean, this ideological belief to “control”, by twisting federal fiduciary obligation, has finally descended upon these isles. The Pinto Boys wanted to ensure that every industry here is “controlled” by the various labor unions as to complete ruin self-government and compromise the very essence of the free enterprise system. They want federally prescribed “control” programs to assuage dictatorship, abject poverty and helplessness down the next millennium.

How short their memories that we broke away from England more than 200 years ago because our founding fathers do not believe in socialism. It’s strangely unique that now these social democrats want to impose socialized medicine, manufacturing, minimum wage, kill the free enterprise system, etc. If such is the case, then we might as well ask President Boris Yeltsin to takeover the White House in Washington. Hey, it’s a short cut to emplacing grand dictatorship so aspired by social democrats.

How ironic that social democrats preach the free enterprise system, yet they themselves are engaged in the gradual shift–via social programs–to dictatorship. They want the labor unions in the US mainland to “control” every aspect of manufacturing even with measures that are completely unrealistic and irrelevant. They refuse to acknowledge that in fact the free enterprise system works phenomenal wonders in wealth and jobs creation even with a resource-poor archipelago.

The bottom line in this agenda is quite simple: Social democrats want to bleed US mainland taxpayers to death to pay for all our needs in a “controlled” situation. How short their memories that when JFK and Reagan reduced taxes, more businesses emerged creating jobs for the jobless, thus empowering them to stand on their two feet. Furthermore, it’s the free enterprise system that has catapulted the robust national economy that now exist. Our country, including this tiny isles, would be swimming in abject poverty and helplessness had it not been for JFK’s and Reagan’s policy of the free enterprise system.

Well, perhaps social democrats can blame both the El Niño and El Niña weather for blurring their once clear vision of the basic precepts upon which the founding fathers saw fit to break away from England. Or is this too difficult to step back and review your ideological belief so to ensure that we don’t veer off from the basic principle of American Democracy?

Disclaimer: Comments are moderated. They will not appear immediately or even on the same day. Comments should be related to the topic. Off-topic comments would be deleted. Profanities are not allowed. Comments that are potentially libelous, inflammatory, or slanderous would be deleted.