Previous Story
Clarification
|
Posted on Jul 07 2011
Point of clarification must be in order.
My continuous effort to treat every employee and staff at RHC equally with respect to their wages, salaries, or pension is foremost. A good number of documents testified to this action.
My inquiry is rooted in Public Law 17-21, Chapter 7 section a, b, c, and e. The total amount appropriated for the municipality of Rota is $6,256.080. This is determined by the Rota Legislative Delegation Resolution pursuant to section b of this amount, RHC is appropriated for three accounts (1912,1957,1989). Each account is allotted an amount and available for expenditure. Lapsed fund may become available when an employee exited his or her employment. It is this lapsed fund amount that this office is requesting for reprogramming action to pay for professional services.
Further allocation is found in:
Section C $340,000 for professional services
$33,000 for mental health counselor
Section D $77,200.00 for dentist
Knowing full well that the Rota Legislative Delegation did not allocate funds for the above cited sections, reprogramming from the unallocated funds is zero. Worse yet, one cannot reprogram fund from a non-existing account with zero amount to any other account. Nothing means zero. The Rota Delegation Resolution must be mindful of this responsibility. One needs not be and OPA or AGO to audit what zero means. This is elementary—you can do it!
This is written to clear up any frivolous attempt to investigate and audit the status of alleged allocation of fund described in section c and d. What needs to be audited is Account No. 1912, 1957 and 1989. My written request to the Mayor of Rota dates June 15, 2011, for these reviews have not been answered.
Let’s put priority where it belongs.
[B]Crispin M. Ayuyu[/B] [I]Director ,PH, RHC[/I]
