Feds to consider Tinian monarch as endangered
A rare Tinian bird that lives in a forest where the U.S. military plans to construct live-fire ranges moved closer to “endangered” status on Friday, when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declared further review of the species was warranted after years of clamor from environmentalists concerned with the growing threat of military presence.
The Service has included the Tinian monarch on a list of dozens of species across the nation to undergo status review over the next year.
The Tinian monarch lives exclusively in Tinian’s forest.
The Service’s announcement on Friday comes two years after a petition filed by the Center of Biological Diversity to protect the bird with endangered status in 2013. It also comes nine months after the Center filed a notice to sue the Service in December last year, alleging that the Service had failed to meet a deadline to declare if the monarch “may warrant” protection.
“The one and only island these birds call home has a long history of habitat destruction,” said Tara Easter, a scientist with the Center in a statement. “With a rampant increase in military combat training in their forested habitat, Endangered Species Act protection is critical to prevent the loss of the Tinian monarch.”
That “military combat” the Center alludes to would be the grenade, mortar, and artillery training, among others, prescribed under the “CNMI Joint Military Training” project.
That expansive live-fire project—under its preferred training alternative—would displace about 7,200 Tinian monarchs, according to the project’s environmental impact documents.
Under all alternatives, the project would remove about 1,800 acres of forest home to native birds like the monarch.
Saipan Tribune pressed several Service officials on Friday to confirm if the status review was triggered by the expanding military activities as the Center claims, but this was not answered as of press time.
The Service was also asked to explain how a potential endangered or threatened status might impact consultations with military, but this was also not answered by the Service.
If listed under the Endangered Species Act, the Service would have to engage in talks with the U.S. military and permit a “take” of the monarch after a biological opinion on impacts is issued, and if the military project is approved and moves forward.
In their impact documents, the U.S. military has noted “significant” and “unavoidable” impacts to Tinian, resulting in the loss of coral reef and acres of native forest, among others.
“The Service was petitioned to review the Tinian monarch and we have completed that 90-day review,” Christine Ogura, acting public affairs officer and Service compliance monitoring coordinator, told Saipan Tribune in an email on Friday.
“Based on the initial assessment of the petition and the information it contained, the Service determined it warrants further review. The Service will begin a required 12-month status review to determine if listing is warranted,” Ogura said.
“To ensure this review is comprehensive, the Service will be requesting scientific and commercial data and other information from myriad sources,” she added.
Saipan Tribune learned that the announced status review is evidence that there exist critical habitat areas on Tinian for the Tinian monarch—making these areas inappropriate for live-fire training.
Only about 549 acres of native forest remain on Tinian, and the monarch has seen population decline by nearly 40 percent between 1996 and 2006, according to the Center.
The Federal Aviation Administration also has concerns with the bird, Saipan Tribune learned, as a special mitigation zone was created for the Tinian monarch in 1999 out of concerns of the impact of Tinian’s Westfield airport expansion.
That year, FAA designated 936 acres of forest within the military’s leaseback area as the “airport mitigation conservation area.” The revised leaseback agreement in 1999 turned Westfield into surplus property and no longer needed for defense-related purposes. However, some 10 years later, things are different as the live-fire project entails construction on the Westfield property as well as impact to the conservation area.
The Center believes that the destruction of this land does not comply with the requirements laid out in these earlier conservation agreements.
On Friday, the Center said the expanding military activities is threatening extinction to the Tinian monarch—a 7.5-inch, tan-faced bird with a gray head, chocolate-brown back and dark wings with white bars, that catches insects and nest in trees and has call sounds just like a squeaky dog toy.
Thank you for reporting this!
Again, so much will be lost with the US Mil establishing a major footprint. Up to what cost do we draw a line in? Love the US Mil as I am once served. But, I don’t think giving free reign of the islands to US Mil is the answer for CNMI’s future. Just my thoughts.
Two years ago, my wife, Ann, and I started a foundation in Minneapolis, to try to save the Monarch Butterfly. The foundation is SaveOurMonarchs Foundation, devoted to saving Monarchs by planting Milkweed seeds.
So now SaveOurMonarchs.org offers free milkweed seeds to anyone. You can just send your request for seeds to SaveOurMonarchs.org and click on ‘Get ‘Seeds’.
Ward Johnson
Sir, respectfully, we are talking birds here in this story, that build nests in trees.
You are talking about butterflies and plants. (milk weed).
BTW milk weed is not indigenous to the CNMI, I doubt that it could legally be brought into the islands at any rate. If it did get here it miht become and invasive species and cause problems.
wat?
Years ago the Tinian Monarch WAS on the endangered list. At the time in the late 90’s when they built the IBB (Voice of America) site in North Field, they had to plant many acres of Tangan tangan to replace the acreage that was cleared for the antenna field and rest of the site.
Although this was done after the fact, the seedlings were brought in from Hawaii. I forgot how many thousands) After some planting the area was not maintained and was overgrown with weeds which smothered a majority of the small plants.
Later on the Monarch was taken off the endangered list due top local requests and investigations by the Feds.
NOW it seems that this is going circle around again. Does anybody in these agencies keep track and records?
With tis article seems the left does not know what the right hand is doing. (or had done) So what has changed??