Intelligent science

Science is (or at least is supposed to be,) founded on the premise that physical processes always act the same way, under the same circumstances. They are repeatable, and reliable to the point of being predictable. Over 300 years ago Newton devised his laws of motion that got men to Moon and back. Such laws are reliable, reproducible, predictable, and that’s what makes them useful.

Every complex process has been found to be composed of simpler processes, all of which can be described mathematically, and thus are predictable. This is how we build our knowledge base. Scientists examine chemical reactions, nuclear reactions, gravitational interactions and the like in order to find how these basic functions work. It’s like studying various kinds of bricks so we can figure out how to build a variety of fancy brick buildings.

However, in the 1920s, science took a nosedive into the mud of confusion with the introduction of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. Without providing any evidence to support his hypothesis, Heisenberg postulated that the universe was fundamentally random, and therefore, could only be examined statistically… that is, somehow, the complex, precise and reliable things we observe are magically generated by his random subatomic world. And people believed him.

However, scientist and educator Richard Feynman wrote: “What about the machinery of it? All we have done is describe how the Earth moves around the Sun. But we have not said what makes it go.” What he longed for was an explanation of the basic machinery of the universe. Why? Because Heisenberg failed to do so.

Finally, the Resonant Field Theory has provided that machinery so we can understand the fundamental mechanism of the universe. What we discover is exactly what Heisenberg was unable to find; in fact, something he thoroughly loathed—a deterministic, cause-and-effect process that actually generates and produces all we observe. But it’s not random. It’s pseudorandom. That is, everything results from specific sequences of reliable cause-and-effect fundamental field interactions that always get it right and never forget how to do it.

So, how does this alter all of science?

Heisenberg’s random world convinced people that it was OK to believe in a stupid and bizarre universe. For example, a supposedly indivisible object such as a photon was supposed to exist in two places at the same time—a foolish idea that has subsequently been demonstrated to be not only false, but deliberately deceptive.

Many scientists today cling to Heisenberg’s bizarre theory because it gives them an excuse to accept absurd and stupid so-called “explanations” for their observations, rather than putting forth the effort to ferret out reality. Evolution is an excellent example. As described earlier in this column, the genetic machinery inherently rejects change, and is incapable of constructing anything that has not been pre-coded into its DNA program.

Given genetic construction, the so called random mutations of evolution would have to orderly and precisely construct each complete working gene. So, just as Heisenberg had to trust in random magic to make is theories work, so to, evolutionists must trust in random mutation magic to make their theories appear to work.

However, by understanding the pseudorandom nature of resonant fields, we come to understand how the whole universe is constructed from the bottom up. We learn from repeatable laboratory evidence that randomness plays no part in building machines that work. Logically, the study of resonant fields will alter science, along with the funding mechanisms that support scientific programs.

If one is unfamiliar with resonant fields, it is an exciting science any high school student can learn. Read the exhilarating e-book, Resonant Fields, the Fundamental Mechanism of Physics, Made Easy To Understand, available online at www.coolscience.info. © 2005 by CoolScience (John N. Hait, Ph.D.)